Friday, May 11, 2012

Nameless Spirit

Of all the sublime poems, there´s one which gathers everything that can be said about the flavour of Reality, and in this case, the vessel was the Spanish poet, Gustavo Adolfo Bécquer. 
Let´s translate it as follows:


Nameless spirit,
indefinable essence,
I live with the formless
life of the idea.

I swim in the void,
I tremble in the sun´s bonfire
I palpitate among the shadows
and float with the mists.

I am the gold fringes
of the distant star;
I am the lukewarm and seren light
of the high moon.

I am the burning cloud 
that in the west undulates,
I am the shinning wake
of the wandering star.

I am snow on the peaks,
fire on the sands, 
blue wave on the seas,
and foam on the shores.

I am the note in the lute,
perfume in the violet,
fleeting flame in the tombs,
and ivy in the ruins.

I thunder in the torrent, 
and whistle in the flash,
and blind in the lightning,
and roar in the storm.

I laugh in the hills, 
whisper in the tall grass,
sigh in the pure wave,
and weep in the dead leaf.

I undulate with the atoms
of the smoke that flows
and slowly ascends to the sky
as immense spiral.

I, on the golden threads
the insects hang,
mingle among the trees
in the fiery nap.

I run after the nymphs
who in the cool stream
of the crystalline brook
frolic naked.

I, in forests of corals 
carpeted by white pearl,
pursue in the ocean
the light naiads.

I, in the hollow caverns
where the sun never penetrates,
mingle with the gnomes, 
and observe their riches.

I look for the already 
dissolved traces of the centuries,
and know of those empires
of which not even the name is left.

I follow in rapid giddiness
the worlds that revolve,
and my pupil embraces
the whole of creation.

I know of those regions
where no noise reaches,
and where formless stars
wait for the breah of life.

I am the bridge that crosses
over the abyss,
,I am the unknown ladder
that joins Heaven & Earth.

I am the invisible ring that
ties the world of the form
to the world of the idea.

In short, I am the Spirit, 
unknown essence, 
mysterious perfume,
of which the poet is vessel.








Monday, March 19, 2012

Freedom, at the beginning

Soon after writing the last post one received a text that shows essentially the same truth about "liberation". Surprisingly, the source which sent it didn´t know about this blog. And since such kind of "meaningful coincidences" seem to be  inspired by a deeper reality, teaching us important lessons, here we have the text, following the thread:


I think it is important to understand that freedom is at the beginning and not at the end. We think freedom is something to be achieved, that liberation is an ideal state of mind to be gradually attained through time, through various practices; but to me, this is a totally wrong approach. Freedom is not to be achieved; liberation is not a thing to be gained. Freedom, or liberation, is that state of mind which is essential for the discovery of any truth, any reality; therefore, it cannot be an ideal; it must exist right from the beginning. Without freedom at the beginning, there can be no moments of direct understanding because all thinking is then limited, conditioned. If your mind is tethered to any conclusion, to any experience, to any form of knowledge or belief, it is not free; and such a mind cannot possibly perceive what is true.  (Jiddu Krishnamurti)


The term "freedom" is one of those concepts that has been totally misunderstood and misused. It has of course many senses; freedom can be physical, biological, psychological, social, political, moral, and even metaphysical if we consider the transition from Nothingness to a Big Bang was an act of  Supreme Will.


However, isn´t the "psychological", or let´s say "spiritual" sense of freedom, the most important for us? Is it not at the root of our actions and behaviors, and therefore, of our understanding of life? More even than the "moral sense", since our beliefs get fixed in our psyche only after something in us "decides" to make them a place, isn´t that so?
We believe we are free to think, free to live as we want, free to be what we are, especially in the so called democratic societies. But, is it true?. What are we free from? Are we free from thoughts? Are we free from emotions and sensations? How much "stuff" conditions our reactive behaviors? 
The truth is that modern humanity has been in a state of inner slavery for thousands of years, since the processes of destruction became a savage habit. And that is not a natural condition given the fact humans have access to something called Intelligence.
Now, since Intelligence help us see the chains which keep us trapped into suffering, why shouldn´t we use it?
There we have the message of Buddha, or Jesus, who is attributed the saying: The Truth shall make you free.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Paradox of Liberation

This second movement of Gorecki´s third symphony, a classic of minimalist music, radiates a strange quality of dark and bright contrasts, a stillness, timelessness and simplicity that are not easy to express, not even to notice, despite inspiring a familiar flavour. An apparently anecdotic impression that may be telling us more than what the heavy mind can grasp.


An old proverb says the spiritual path is more difficult than walking on the edge of a knife. Yet, it is also said there´s nothing more natural and simple than "being on the Way". Anything can lead to Consciousness and Liberation; but anything can also lead to a trap. 
Is this what makes the journey so complicated and treacherous?
Perhaps that is why human life is so erratic and contradictory, full of dark and bright contrasts, wonders and miseries that coexist.
Yet, which is the root of the human falls? Perhaps a distorted perception of Reality, a lack of discernment? Can inner conflicts, source of the outer ones, cease with a glimpse of that "ineffable and everpresent Something" which is the Source and Destiny of everything?


Only so long as one considers oneself bound do thoughts of bondage and Liberation continue. When one enquires who is bound, the Self is realized, eternally attained, eternally free. When thought of bondage comes to an end, can thought of Liberation survive?
If it is said that Liberation is of three kinds: with form, without form, and both together, then let me tell you that the extinction of those three forms of Liberation is the only true Liberation.
(Ramana Maharshi, verses 39 & 40, 
from Forty Verses on Reality)

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Inner Requiem


The Winter afternoon is cold but very bright. The sun shines in all its glory. Meanwhile, a man walks on a park, feeling fresh air on his hands and face, immersed in some reflections. After a long stroll, he sits on a rock to rest and lets all tensions go, listening to all around, enjoying the body's  natural breath, the sunlight, the quiet presence of trees and birds...The mental fist disolves...A deep silence breaks the Maya...A realization takes place....He's not a body, not a man, but an openness that includes All; nobody is listening; everything is listening. What a relief! The bundle of the past is gone. Nothing to gain. Nothing to loose. Nothing to fear. Nothing to desire...A perfect moment, timeless...


Mind alone, delusion; emotions alone, wild horses; body alone, weakness. Isn't this inner separation the very same illusion of Time, what makes us identified with the waves in an ocean, trapped in a mind that thinks "I´m this", "I´m that", "this cannot last", "I have to do this... do that"; a mind that tries to grasp what cannot be grasped, carrying too much "me", "mine" and "I"?


Can we really be all at once, even if it's just in a few daily actions?. What a difficult task!...How complicated we make things. How many painful turns we take in life; how many distractions we cultivate in order to find the wholeness that lies everywhere and nowhere at the same time, suspended in eternity, like that sublime piece Gabriel Fauré brought more than a century ago, for a "Requiem" that really ends as a new beginning, a new Life.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Creativity

You cannot reconcile creativeness with technical achievement. You may be perfect in playing the piano, and not be creative; you may play the piano most brilliantly, and not be a musician. You may be able to handle color, to put paint on canvas most cleverly, and not be a creative painter. You may create a face, an image out of a stone, because you have learned the technique, and not be a master creator. Creation comes first, not technique, and that is why we are miserable all our lives. We have technique -how to put up a house, how to build a bridge, how to assemble a motor, how to educate our children through a system; we have learned all these techniques, but our hearts and minds are empty. We are first class machines; we know how to operate most beautifully, but we do not love a living thing. You may be a good engineer,  you may write in a good style in English or Marathi or whatever your language is, but creativeness is not found through technique. If you have something to say, you create your own style; but when you have nothing to say, even if you have a beautiful style, what you write is only the traditional routine, a repetition in new words of the same old thing. Having lost the song, we pursue the singer. We learn from the singer the technique of song, but there is no song. The song is essential, the joy of singing is essential. So, if you watch yourself very critically, you will see that technique does not lead to creativeness, but when you have creativeness, you can have technique within a week. To express something you must have a song in your heart and sensitivity to receive (J. Krishnamurti, The Book of Life).
As an illustration of this argument we have chosen one of the hundreds of music pieces composed by G.I.Gurdjieff & Thomas De Hartmann, one of his pupils. And the reason is precisely that this music is not based on a great virtuosity or technical achievement –as it is the case in the works of Chopin or Liszt–, but rather on a slight brush that gives a glimpse of special places and something profound in ourselves.
Gurdjieff received much inspiration from folk tunes, songs and dances he witnessed while traveling through Central Asia and North Africa. Later, in the early 1900's, he found Thomas de Hartmann in Russia, a very accomplished and classically trained composer, who helped Gurdjieff to express certain Oriental themes by using Western harmony and instrumentation. Working together, beyond conventions and dead rutines, they crafted some of the deepest and most original compositions of the XXth century, most of which are an integrant part of the so called "movements" and "sacred dances" that Gurdjieff crafted as well. But that's another story.


Saturday, December 24, 2011

To Be Reborn

Surprising as it may sound, the theme of Christmas always had a very special significance even before Jesus/Yeshua was born. The reason is that it does not point exclusively to the birth of a particular individual, but to the birth in the body of something much more subtle and deeper: the spiritual baby-soul, which can grow up to the stage called Child  of Light, where a higher Father-Mother are acknowledged. 

It's worth remembering the Gopel of John, when Jesus speaks to Nicodemus:

"Verily, verily I say unto thee that unless you be born of Water and of Spirit, you shall not enter the Kingdom of God".

And unless you become like little children, you shall not enter....

The meaning of these words is something to discovered within, not outside. 

The search can only be guided by a Loving Consciousness that was expressed with archetypes such as the Buddha Mind or the Holy Spirit, which is the reconciled union of the Mother Light Soul and the Father Will and Intelligence, the fecunding principle.

In Antiquity, those who were at least able to be consciously born out of the Holy Spirit used to be called Christians and little Buddhas. They were very prepared and respectful men and women, humans as we rarely see in these days. 

Now, the ultimate and natural birthright of the human being is not only to be born as a Son of the Spiritual Mother-Father but to reach the level of Christ/Massiah, that is, the Perfect Man, who is not only able to access at will the heavenly realms of the Mother Light (aim of Buddhist and Sufi paths), but also has access to the Absolute Heaven of the Father, as Yahshua ha Massiah (i.e Jesus the Christ) was able to accomplish.

But how many are even willing to submit to the higher Will and be prepared to follow the source of true Love Compassion?

Given the conditioning, many think this is far from ordinary beings. But the light of Consciousness is always available for everyone, not just "soul-embryos".

So, it´s just a question of choice, of wanting to see how one gets trapped in blind desires, aversions, delusions, and find the other Way. That is already a  promise of future births.

What keeps the Light from shinning through us?

Saturday, December 17, 2011

How Can We Keep From Listening...?



From all the "middle way" or "non dual" teachings we learn that every aspect of life is but an expression of Truth; even our states of unbalance can guide our steps, always provided the right alignment and listening take place at the precise moment.

In this sense, it's enriching to wonder why mystic shamans like the ancient Orphics, Pythagoras or Rumi stressed so much the importance of living in accord to an "inner song". 

Famous are the stories about Orpheus, who crossed the underworld with the help of his magical song; or the mythic references to "the language of the birds", which may be whispered by everything, at any moment, anywhere.

What does all that mean?

Humans are also taught that whether we know it or not, we were born for a sacred purpose, with a set of experiences to learn from. So, it seems vital to find our inner aims and live in accord with them.

A pertinent accompaniment for these reflections is perhaps an old song, whose title, How Can I Keep From Singing?, can be a bit bewildering, like the heading of this post, since these questions have a rhetorical sense that encourages us to open our mind and heart. Something else to ponder on.

The music of that song was composed by Robert Lowry in the nineteenth century, as melody for an old hymn, later adapted by the folk singer Pete Seeger and other artists.

Above we have a new version.